—
Welcome — README
FileEditFontSizeStyleSimpleText

Felipe Guarin

ARTIST & AI LEADER · AI LEAD AT PLATZI · ATLANTA


My installation Apperception turns a visitor's live brain activity into images in real time; it was shown at LOOP Atlanta during the Atlanta Film Festival's 50th-anniversary SOUND + VISION. An optimistic builder fueled by curiosity and impact, I'm AI Lead at Platzi, building generative AI products that change how people learn. Before that, AI Lead at Adtechnacity — where our products drove an 89% RPM increase and $10M+ in incremental revenue. 500+ AI projects shipped, an esports platform built in Japan, an award-winning creative agency, and an MIT Hackathon win.

If you're building AI products that change how people work and learn — let's talk.

— double-click any icon on the desktop to open a program —

AI & Thinking — SimpleText
FileEditFontSizeSimpleText · 13 entries
Article

Everyone’s panicking about AI making us ‘dumber.’ Here’s the smarter take.

by Felipe Guarín · Oct 31, 2025


Recent studies from MIT Media Lab and Carnegie Mellon/Microsoft are sparking important conversations about AI’s impact on our cognitive abilities. While these findings certainly raise valid concerns about the potential for AI to diminish our critical faculties if used improperly, I believe there’s a crucial nuance we need to highlight, one I’ve been reflecting on in my own experiences.

The MIT Media Lab study, for instance, showed that students relying on ChatGPT for essay writing exhibited reduced brain engagement, poorer memory, and less ownership of their work. This research specifically focused on a scenario where AI was used for passive content generation, leading to what researchers term “cognitive offloading”. Similarly, the Carnegie Mellon and Microsoft study found that higher confidence in generative AI tools correlated with a reduction in critical thinking among knowledge workers, particularly when tasks were offloaded without sufficient human oversight.

These findings are important. However, my experience, especially in problem-solving scenarios, suggests a different story: when fully engaged in an activity like problem-solving, AI can enhance critical thinking. This perspective is strongly supported by research like the Harvard Business School study on creative problem-solving.

This study highlighted how generative AI, when used as part of “human‑guided AI partnerships,” can significantly enhance creative problem-solving. Their findings demonstrated that solutions generated through human-led and AI-augmented collaboration were often of higher overall quality and strategic value, showcasing the power of “AI-in-the-loop” workflows for innovative, open-ended problems.

The distinction is critical:

Passive Generation: Using AI to simply produce content (e.g., essay writing) can lead to reduced cognitive effort and critical thinking.

Active Problem‑Solving: Collaborating with AI as a tool for exploration, analysis, and iterative refinement can augment human creativity and critical thinking.

It’s not about whether we use AI, but how we engage with it. When we maintain our agency, critically evaluate AI outputs, and use it as a partner in complex problem solving, we unlock its potential to elevate our cognitive capabilities rather than diminish them.

But hey this is just my opinion. What are your thoughts on this?

#MIT #Harvard #AI #Innovation #CriticalThinking #HumanAICollaboration #FutureOfWork #ProblemSolving

Open: